-
October, 2009
-
July, 2009
-
November, 2008
-
October, 2008
-
September, 2008
-
August, 2008
-
July, 2008
-
June, 2008
-
May, 2008
-
April, 2008
-
March, 2008
-
February, 2008
-
January, 2008
-
April, 2007
-
February, 2007
-
December, 2006
-
November, 2006
-
October, 2006
-
September, 2006
-
August, 2006
-
July, 2006
-
June, 2006
-
May, 2006
-
April, 2006
-
March, 2006
-
February, 2006
-
January, 2006
-
December, 2005
-
November, 2005
-
October, 2005
-
September, 2005
-
August, 2005
-
July, 2005
-
June, 2005
-
May, 2005
-
April, 2005
-
March, 2005
-
February, 2005
-
January, 2005
-
December, 2004
|
|
|
"Yes" & "No" to be Proportionally Represented |
|
By Burt Safer | Dealer staff writer
|
Tue, Sep 23, 2008 |
|
CINCINNATI - In November, the Board of Elections will actually use Proportional Representation (PR) when PR goes on the ballot for Issue 8, so that voters can better understand how PR works.
Voters will have a chance to rank their "Yes", "No", and "Maybe" choices on the ballot (see picture example). PR advocates applauded this move, stating that "Yes", "No", and "Maybe" would be better represented by their constituencies in this election.
Here's how PR works:
For purposes of this example, let's say "No" gets the most first place votes in November. Any surplus of votes for No will then be redistributed to the surplus voters' second choice. So some No voters get their first choice, while other, specialer No voters get their second choice.
If enough No voters had chosen a second choice of "Maybe", then Maybe could potentially move into first place, and become more proportionally represented than No. However, many of Maybe's new surplus of votes could then be deferred to the third choice of even specialer voters: "Yes". Therefore, "Yes" would become the winner, becoming truly, the most proportionally represented of them all.
|
|
|
|
|
|