The Cincinnati Dealer - Sexists, Racists Cast Ballots in Indiana

In Other News

WEBN Inadvertently Tells Truth in Ads

Crossover Voters to Face 4 Years of Junk Mail

Swedish Cult Opens Local Chapter

'Find and Replace' Used for Upcoming News

Locals Can't Find Entrance to Freedom Center

Larry Flynt to open his own "Bodies" exhibit

Cincinnati to Install Public Urination Cameras

Subscribe in a reader

Subscribe by email

Sexists, Racists Cast Ballots in Indiana

By Burt Safer | Dealer staff writer

Tue, May 6, 2008

i-voted-today INDIANA - Indiana sexists and racists went to the polls today to finally cast their ballots in the prolonged battle for supremacy between sexism and racism. These were the only factors in their votes today, being that no other issues are pertinent. This contest has been so well-fought that many have been hoping that either sexism or racism would just drop out of the running.

"I'm voting for racism," said Gina Silver, racist mother of three in South Bend, "You know, it definitely is a hard decision to make, but which one will get more support in November?"

"Just about everyone nowadays is racist, and that's why I feel racism will prevail in the General Election this November," she said.

Indianapolis sexist Pat Hoffman sees things differently, and has chosen to side with sexism.

"With sexism, everyone's on one side or the other, but with racism there are too many different ethnic groups out there," said Hoffman, "The sexists just make up a larger voting bloc - it's simple arithmetic."

However, most Indiana voters polled are in agreement that no matter what happens today, either sexism or racism would be preferable to John McCain.

Sidelines

Kroger Shopper Gets Dry Idea

Man Attacked by Foul Balls, Returns Fire

Local Foot Fetishist Likes Them Shiny

Cigarette Prices Rising - Two Cigarettes Cost County $42,000

Bengals Trade Chad Johnson for Ken Griffey Jr

U.S. Playing Card Wants Its Own Enquirer Blogger Too

2500 Rally in Support of Payday

Quick Poll

The CCV wants to end the Adult ads in the back of CityBeat. How do YOU feel?

	I am outraged. I responded to one of those ads, and didn't even get a handjob.
	I really don't care about those ads, but can you give me more information about the "Safe Sex Get Paid" ads?
	I think we should ban those ads, as soon as we finish banning porn from the internet.
	The Adult section is too important for the back pages. They should move it to the front, like in the Yellow Pages.
	I think children ought to be protected from words like "body rub" and "tantric massage".
	Does anyone else know if "accupressure" is as sexy as it sounds?
	Sorry, not for me. The best whores don't place ads in a newspaper.

What Grinds Your Gears?
Send your column and an optional photo to This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it . We love photos.