The Cincinnati Dealer
The Straight Dope From A Straight Dope
Home
Top Stories
Business
Sports
Life
Opinion
Comics
Advice
Classifieds/Personals
Special Advertising Section

Staff
Search
Login

 


Green hosting by Dreamhost.com

 Subscribe in a reader

Subscribe by email
Ali Outshines Pepper, Mallory
By Gerard Oh | Dealer staff writer    Wed, Oct 26, 2005
 

WINTON PLACE - Mayoral candidates David Pepper and Mark Mallory duked it out in one of the few televised debates of the mayoral campaign last night at the Este Conference Center. By the end of the night, the victor was clear: Sandra Ali.

An informal poll conducted at the end asked the audience who they would be most likely to vote for today.

  1. 44% for Sandra Ali
  2. 29% for Mark Mallory
  3. 25% for David Pepper
  4. 2% for John London

Audience member Tony Stuart said, "Frankly, I couldn't tell you a single word either candidate said. But I'd like to see the delightful moderator run for office."

Paneling the debate was (again) Tiana Rollinson of the Cincinnati Herald, John London of WLWT Channel 5, and Maryanne Zeleznik of 91.7 FM WVXU radio.

Rollinson managed to avoid the type of mind-numbing questions that she asked at a previous debate.

London, when informed that he got a few votes for mayor in the poll, scratched his chin and said, "Hmmm, mayor London... I like the sound of that."

Dave Wagner, also of WLWT, was fielding audience questions. When informed that he received no votes for mayor, he stormed out of the conference center mumbling something about how "freakin London will get his someday."

|  
 
Quick Poll
After Ike's damage to Cincinnati, how are you taking precautions against future hurricanes?

 


What Grinds Your Gears?

Send your column and an optional photo to This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it . We love photos.



© 2004-2008 The Cincinnati Dealer. All rights reserved. Disclaimer: This site is a farce. So are its writers for that matter. All stories are fictional parody and should not in any way be construed as fact.